Contrarian Corpus
short seller conference presentation initial thesis
2020-04-20 · 65 pages

New Pacific Metals NUAG

Bolivia-focused silver developer New Pacific trades 17x peers on concessions likely acquired illegally under a now-ousted regime; Hindenburg targets C$0.37, 90%+ downside.

N 5 Narrative
V 4 Visual
C 4 Craft
Source URL unavailable

Thesis

Hindenburg argues New Pacific Metals — a ~C$700M Toronto-listed silver developer whose flagship Silver Sand project sits in Potosi, Bolivia — trades at ~US$2.55 per in-situ silver ounce, roughly 17x the ~US$0.15 peer median, implying 85% downside to a Bear Creek-style valuation. The bull case rests on Bolivian concessions that Hindenburg believes were acquired in violation of Bolivian law under then-Mines Minister Cesar Navarro, who fled to Mexico after Evo Morales' November 2019 ouster; the COMIBOL contract is unratified and local officials doubt it will pass parliament. Management carries further red flags: CEO Rui Feng also chairs Silvercorp (alleged grade-inflator, litigious toward critics like Jon Carnes and Kun Huang), an 'independent' geologist who authored Silver Sand's technical report was a former Silvercorp VP, and prior Chinese projects bought from Silvercorp all failed. Hindenburg is short both NUPMF and SVM with a C$0.37 price target.

SCQA

Situation

New Pacific Metals is a Toronto-listed silver explorer whose Potosi, Bolivia Silver Sand project drove a ~400% stock run, backed by Silvercorp and Pan American Silver stakes and rising silver prices.

Complication

Concessions were acquired under Mines Minister Cesar Navarro in likely violation of Bolivian law; Navarro fled to Mexico after the November 2019 Morales coup, leaving the COMIBOL contract unratified and ratification unlikely. CEO runs fraud-tainted Silvercorp.

Resolution

Hindenburg is short both New Pacific (NUPMF) and Silvercorp (SVM), arguing investors should reprice the stock to balance-sheet-plus-Silver-Sand value rather than the speculative Bolivian upside currently implied.

Reward

Price target of C$0.37, over 90% downside, derived from a scenario-weighted mix of concession revocation (C$0.30, 60%), renegotiated deal (C$0.45, 30%), and as-is ratification (C$0.59, 10%).

The three reasons

  1. 1

    Silver Sand concessions likely acquired illegally; ratification unlikely after Morales' ouster and Navarro's flight

  2. 2

    Trades at $2.55/oz EV — 17x the $0.15 peer median on a 191M-oz resource

  3. 3

    CEO Rui Feng's Silvercorp history includes grade-inflation allegations and litigation against critics

Primary demands

  • Short New Pacific Metals (NUPMF / NUAG)
  • Short Silvercorp Metals (SVM)

KPIs cited

EV per silver-equivalent ounce
New Pacific $2.55/oz vs $0.15 peer average — 17.2x premium
Silver resource (maiden estimate)
191M oz Ag vs ~1.3B oz required to justify C$700M market cap at $0.50/oz
Silver grade at Silver Sand
~132 g/t Ag (low-grade, complex sulphide/oxide/transition metallurgy)
Silver recovery in bottle-roll tests
LEACHMET 1: 59.1%–77.5% on low-grade oxide; LEACHMET 4: 69.0% or less on high-grade oxide
Alcira acquisition price paid
$45M by New Pacific vs $530K paid by prior Chinese owners — ~85x markup
Silvercorp ownership of New Pacific
~29% per recent management circular
Stock performance since Silver Sand purchase
Up ~400%
Balance sheet liquid assets
C$43M (C$33.6M cash + C$8.7M bonds) — C$0.30/share in liquidation
Paid promotion disclosed
$200K to GoldNewsLetter, $25K/yr to Proactive Canada
Development timeline
Estimated 10 years from production

Pattern membership

Where this document fits across the library's 12 rhetorical / structural patterns.

Precedents cited

  • Jon Carnes' 2011 Silvercorp fraud report
  • MiMedx suing short-sellers then charged criminally with fraud
  • Prophecy Development Pulacayo-Paca grade manipulation allegations
  • Bear Creek Mining (Corani project) as appropriate EV/oz comparable

Notable slides (6)

Notes

Presented by Nathan Anderson at the Contrarian Investor Conference on April 20, 2020 — this is the abbreviated conference deck; a fuller written report is referenced at hindenburgresearch.com. The title slide ('Bolivia Looks Friendly Until A Coup Forces Your Friends to Flee to Mexico') is itself a masterclass in SCQA compression. Deck structure is notably clean: 3 labelled parts (Bolivian control risk, management red flags, fundamental overvaluation) + scenario-weighted price target. Dual short thesis (NUPMF + SVM). No stake percentage disclosed (short positions are sized in dollar terms, not %). Valuation anchored to Bear Creek Mining as fair comp at $0.16/oz vs NUAG's $2.55/oz.