Contrarian Corpus
short seller full deck initial thesis
2021-04-08 · 63 pages

Porch Group Inc PRCH

Porch is 'Active Network 2.0' run by the same CEO — a money-losing lead-gen business dressed as SaaS, with barter accounting and hidden debt implying 50%-70% downside to $5-$8.

N 4 Narrative
V 3 Visual
C 3 Craft
Unlock to download PDF Spruce Point research ↗

Thesis

Spruce Point argues Porch Group (PRCH), a recently de-SPAC'd home-services platform, is a near-identical replay of The Active Network — the failed 'everything portal' where CEO Matt Ehrlichman was Chief Strategy Officer before ACTV was taken private at 2x sales. Spruce Point alleges Ehrlichman misrepresents his ACTV track record and concealed the founding of HelpScore.com (Porch's predecessor) while still at ACTV. At Porch they identify barter-for-leads transactions that inflate gross margin by ~230bps, $1.1bn of off-balance-sheet financial guarantees, understated leases, a disputed $33m Lowe's stock transaction questioned by the SEC, and a Kandela lawsuit alleging Ehrlichman overstated homebuyer data. Applying 2.0x-4.0x 2021E revenue — in line with Bankrate, MyMove and ACTV takeouts — Spruce Point pegs fair value at $5.06-$8.56/share, 50%-70% below the $17.34 market price, with long-term downside to zero absent new funding.

SCQA

Situation

Porch Group is a recently de-SPAC'd home-services platform pitched as a high-growth SaaS portal connecting home inspectors, movers and homeowners to service providers, trading at 9x 2021E sales and ~$1.2bn market cap.

Complication

Spruce Point argues Porch is an 'everything spaghetti' lead-gen business run by the same CEO who presided over Active Network's failed 2x-sales exit, uses barter revenue, hides $1.1bn of guarantees, and faces an active fraud lawsuit.

Resolution

Investors should sell PRCH, re-value the business on peer lead-generation M&A multiples of 2.0x-4.0x forward sales, use a fully diluted share count, and discount management claims about SaaS economics and unit lead values.

Reward

Spruce Point targets $5.06-$8.56 per share — 50%-70% intermediate downside from $17.34 — with potential 100% long-term downside if Porch's strategy shift fails and losses mount without additional funding.

The three reasons

  1. 1

    Porch is ACTV 2.0 — same CEO, same 'everything portal' playbook that failed and sold for 2x sales

  2. 2

    Barter-for-leads accounting inflates gross margin by ~230bps; SEC has charged similar schemes

  3. 3

    Off-balance-sheet guarantees, leases and CEO bio misrepresentations point to 50%-70% downside

Primary demands

  • Investors should sell PRCH shares (Strong Sell opinion)
  • SEC and investors should scrutinize Porch's barter revenue recognition and cost-of-revenue disclosure
  • Investors should reassess CEO Matt Ehrlichman's biographical claims and link to the failed Active Network playbook
  • Investors should re-price Porch using peer lead-generation M&A comps at 2.0x-4.0x sales
  • Market should use a fully diluted share count (~100m) reflecting warrants, HOA shares and options

KPIs cited

Downside to price target
50%-70% intermediate (to $5.06-$8.56), with 100% long-term potential
EV / 2021E Revenue
Porch trades at 9.0x vs. peer average 2.7x and Spruce Point target 2.0x-4.0x
Gross margin overstatement
~230 basis points inflated by unrecorded cost of lead barter (~$8.1m)
Per-inspection lead value
Porch assumes $25; ex-employees and InterNACHI peg $14-$15 (~40% lower)
Financial guarantees off balance sheet
Estimated $1.1bn of max potential exposure understating true leverage
Claimed debt vs. actual
$40m disclosed vs. ~$51m principal payments required per 10-K p.89
Disputed Lowe's / CEO transaction
$33m recorded as stock comp despite company claiming it was not a party to the deal
Share count adjustment
81.5m Street basic vs. 100m Spruce Point diluted (warrants 14.3m, HOA 1.0m, options 3.0m)
ACTV take-out multiple
Vista Equity bought Active Network at ~2x EV/Revenue in 2013 (~$1.05bn)
Net loss trajectory
Losses widened from $50.4m (2018) to $103.2m (2019)

Pattern membership

Where this document fits across the library's 12 rhetorical / structural patterns. Orange cells are present in this deck; neutral cells are not.

Precedents cited

  • The Active Network (ACTV) — Prescience Point / Spruce Point 2012 short; Vista Equity take-private at 2x sales
  • iRobot (May 2015 / June 2017 Spruce Point reports)
  • ECHO Global Logistics (Sept 2016 Spruce Point report)
  • Bazaarvoice (May 2012 Spruce Point report)
  • Red Ventures / Bankrate (RATE) acquisition 2017 at 2.6x sales
  • Red Ventures / Imagitas-MyMove acquisition 2015 at 2x sales
  • SEC barter fraud cases: The North Face, Candie's, Itex, EasyLink Services, Retail Pro

Composition what's on the 63 slides

Visual + textual elements counted across every slide in this deck. Hover a box for what that element is; click to see every slide in the corpus that uses it.

Slide gallery ·

All 63
No slide inventory yet

Pass-2 extraction may still be in progress for this deck.

Notes

Classic Spruce Point short: 'strong sell' cover with clown/mouse metaphor (porch on flimsy foundation), red-flag icons throughout, yellow/orange highlight callouts, and a recurring 'Porch = ACTV 2.0' analogy anchored to Spruce Point founder Ben Axler's prior successful short of The Active Network (2012). Key rhetorical devices: (a) Spruce Point 'activist success' track-record table on p.4 establishing credibility via ACTIVE/iRobot/ECHO/Bazaarvoice; (b) side-by-side playbook comparison between Porch.com and Active.com on p.15 (same employees, same strategy, same auditor E&Y); (c) CEO biography-vs-reality comparison on pp.13-14 with SEC filings; (d) SEC barter-fraud precedent table on p.9 (North Face, Candie's, Itex). No stake disclosure — Spruce Point discloses only that it is short. Closing valuation range on p.63 drives the 50%-70% / $5.06-$8.56 headline.