Contrarian Corpus
activist full deck
2015-08-01 · 42 pages

Icahn Enterprises L.P. (self) IEP

N 2 Narrative
V 3 Visual
C 2 Craft
Original source ↗

The three reasons

  1. 1

    IEP stock returned 1,426% since Jan 2000 vs. 89% for S&P 500

  2. 2

    Low rates and cash-rich, poorly-governed companies make activism highly accretive

  3. 3

    Diversified portfolio generates $1bn LTM EBITDA and $8bn indicative NAV

Primary demands

  • Invest in IEP depositary units to participate in Icahn's activist strategy
  • Benefit from 6.9% annual distribution yield ($6.00/unit)
  • Gain exposure to diversified activist-run holding company across nine operating segments

KPIs cited

Total stock return since Jan 2000
1,426% for IEP vs. 89% S&P 500, 122% Dow, 204% Russell 2000
Annualized return since Jan 2000
19.2% for IEP vs. 4.2% S&P 500
3-year gross return (to Jun 2015)
154% IEP vs. 64% Berkshire, 22% Leucadia, -4% Loews
Icahn Investment Funds return since Nov 2004
~258% cumulative, ~13% compounded annual
Indicative Net Asset Value
$8.0 billion as of June 30, 2015
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to IEP
~$1.0 billion LTM ended June 30, 2015
Adjusted Net Income
$374 million for six months ended June 30, 2015
Total assets
$31.3 billion as of June 30, 2015
Annual distribution / yield
$6.00 per depositary unit, 6.9% yield at June 30, 2015
CVR Energy gain since acquisition
~$2.0 billion pre-tax gain; stock up ~93% from $30 tender price
Carl Icahn ownership of IEP
~88.7% of outstanding depositary units

Pattern membership

Where this document fits across the library's 12 rhetorical / structural patterns.

Notable slides (6)

Notes

Atypical for an activist corpus: this is an IEP investor-relations deck marketing Icahn Enterprises itself to prospective depositary unit holders, NOT an activist campaign against a target. The 'thesis' is meta — why activism as a strategy works and why IEP is the vehicle to access it. Page 3 peer-gap table benchmarks IEP vs. Berkshire/Leucadia/Loews (interesting positioning as a Buffett-adjacent compounder). Page 9 org chart doubles as an implicit sum-of-parts. Essay-like full-text pages 5-6 articulate the 'activist catalyst' philosophy — useful quote mine. Recent Funds performance was weak (-7.4% 2014, +8.4% H1 2015) which the deck softens by leaning on long-horizon compounded numbers. Campaign phase tagged 'unknown' because this is not a campaign doc.