Contrarian Corpus
activist letter initial thesis
2024-07-15 · 5 pages

Match Group, Inc. MTCH

Match owns Tinder and Hinge yet trades at <8.5x FCF; fixing Tinder, lifting margins above 40%, and aggressive buybacks — or a sale — can unlock substantial upside.

N 4 Narrative
V 2 Visual
C 3 Craft
Unlock to download PDF Original source ↗

Thesis

Starboard discloses a 6.6% stake in Match Group, the global online dating leader with ~15M payers across Tinder, Hinge and a portfolio of legacy and emerging apps generating ~$3.6B of revenue. Despite owning two premier assets, Match has lost nearly 70% since its 2020 IAC separation and now trades below 8.5x 2024 FCF, a ~45% discount to scaled tech peers. Starboard argues Tinder's product innovation gap is addressable under CEO Bernard Kim, that adjusted operating margins should expand from the mid-30s to over 40% (Match itself ran 38% in 2019 on 40% less revenue), and that the company should deploy 75%+ of >$1B of annual FCF plus ~$900M of unused leverage capacity into buybacks. If management cannot execute, the Board must objectively compare the public-company plan against a sale or take-private.

SCQA

Situation

Match Group is the global online dating leader with ~15M paying users, owning Tinder (~$2B revenue, ~50% EBITDA margins) and fast-growing Hinge inside a multi-app portfolio in a secularly growing industry.

Complication

Since the 2020 IAC spin, MTCH is down ~70%; Tinder users and payers are declining due to product stagnation, incremental EBITDA margins from 2019-24 were just 33.5%, and the stock trades at <8.5x FCF.

Resolution

Fix Tinder's product, cut G&A and consolidate platforms to push operating margins above 40%, deploy 75%+ of FCF plus ~$900M of leverage capacity into buybacks, and have the Board genuinely weigh a sale/take-private.

Reward

Starboard projects $5.50+ of FCF per share by 2026; at peer multiples (median 14.7x vs MTCH's <6x pro forma) the implied re-rating is greater than 60% upside.

The three reasons

  1. 1

    Match trades at <8.5x 2024 FCF — a ~45% discount to scaled tech peers

  2. 2

    Margins should exceed 40% but incremental margins ran only 33.5% from 2019-2024

  3. 3

    Tinder's user/payer declines are fixable product issues, not secular decay

Primary demands

  • Improve revenue growth by fixing Tinder's product innovation deficit
  • Expand adjusted operating margins to over 40% via cost rationalization and operating leverage
  • Pursue a more aggressive share repurchase program using 75%+ of FCF plus ~$900M of leverage capacity
  • Board must seriously evaluate a sale / take-private as an alternative path
  • Deliver tangible Tinder turnaround data points in the near term or consider strategic changes

KPIs cited

Stake disclosed
Starboard owns ~6.6% of Match, third largest shareholder, per 13D filed 7/15/2024
Share price performance since IAC spin (Jul-2020 to Jul-2024)
MTCH -69.5% vs Russell 1000 Tech +145.8%, Nasdaq Composite +81.2%, S&P 500 +80.2%
Valuation – Price / 2024E FCF
MTCH 8.3x vs peer set median 14.7x — ~45% discount
Valuation – Price / pro forma 2026E FCF
MTCH ~5.7x — >60% discount to peer median
Revenue scale
~$2B revenue in 2019 to expected $3.6B in 2024
Revenue growth rate
Slowed from ~20% in 2019 to ~6% expected in 2024
Adjusted EBITDA margin trajectory
38.0% (2019) → 37.4% (2020) → 35.8% (2021) → 36.1% (2022) → 36.2% (2023) → 36.1% (2024E)
Cumulative incremental adjusted EBITDA margin 2019-2024E
Only 33.5% — below consolidated margin; Starboard expects >50%
Tinder
~$2B revenue, ~10M payers, >55% of Match revenue, ~50% Adjusted EBITDA margin
Evergreen & Emerging segment
~20% of Match revenue; emerging apps expected to outpace evergreen declines starting 2025
Net leverage
Currently 2.3x vs 3.0x target; ~$900M of unused capacity available for buybacks
Free cash flow
>$1B expected in 2024; Company committed to use ≥75% of FCF for repurchases
Cost savings opportunity
$60M from technology platform consolidations cited by management
Target operating margin
>40% adjusted operating margins (vs 38% achieved in 2019)
2026E FCF per share
$5.50 or more

Pattern membership

Where this document fits across the library's 12 rhetorical / structural patterns. Orange cells are present in this deck; neutral cells are not.

Composition what's on the 5 slides

Visual + textual elements counted across every slide in this deck. Hover a box for what that element is; click to see every slide in the corpus that uses it.

Chart types used in this deck

Slide gallery ·

No slide inventory yet

Pass-2 extraction may still be in progress for this deck.

Notes

Open letter from Jeffrey Smith (Starboard Managing Member) to Match CEO Bernard 'BK' Kim and CFO Gary Swidler, accompanying Starboard's 13D disclosing a ~6.6% stake — this is the public unveiling of the campaign. Tone is notably collaborative for an activist (praises BK's gaming background and recent buyback commitment) but contains an explicit 'or else' lever: if performance does not improve the Board should examine a take-private. Letter format with three embedded charts (price performance vs indices/BMBL, peer P/FCF bar chart shown twice — second time annotated with revenue growth rates and a 2026E PF MTCH bar). Standard Starboard navy/red institutional formatting; not a designed deck. Not signed under proxy fight; classified as initial_thesis given this is the inaugural public Starboard letter on MTCH.