Contrarian Corpus
activist full deck proxy fight
2017-08-17 · 168 pages

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. ADP

ADP is a sleeping giant earning 19% Employer Services margins versus peers' 35-40% potential; electing Pershing's nominees catalyzes a transformation worth 100%+ in under four years.

Thesis

Pershing Square argues ADP is a 'lethargic, inefficient sleeping giant' whose Employer Services segment generates only ~19% operating margins versus Paychex's ~41% and Ultimate Software's 30-40% structural potential — a gap created by a decades-old COBOL-based AutoPay engine, a 'spaghetti' of legacy products, bloated sales and implementation headcount, a functional matrix structure with up to 11 management layers, and ~$300m of legacy IT spend that crowds out real R&D. The deck quantifies a 1,500-2,000bps margin opportunity in Employer Services by FY2022, lifting EPS from a status-quo $5.90 to $8.70 (~47%) and the share price to $221-$255 (101-132% total return) by June 2021. Pershing invokes Solera and CDK Global — both former ADP segments that expanded margins ~2,000bps within years of leaving ADP — as living proof. The ask is to elect Bill Ackman and two independent directors at the 2017 annual meeting.

SCQA

Situation

ADP is the $49bn industry leader in HR and payroll outsourcing, serving ~700,000 clients globally through three businesses — Employer Services, PEO, and Client Fund Float Income — with Employer Services driving roughly two-thirds of profit.

Complication

Employer Services earns only ~19% operating margins versus Paychex's ~41% and Ultimate's 30-40% potential, throttled by a COBOL-era payroll engine, bloated implementation headcount, siloed business units, and up to 11 management layers — while bookings disclosure and PEO pass-throughs mask the underperformance.

Resolution

Elect Bill Ackman and two independent directors at the 2017 annual meeting, form a board transformation committee, redesign management incentives, accelerate product and back-end investment, cut legacy IT spend, and unwind the matrix corporate structure.

Reward

Lift Employer Services margins from ~19% to mid-to-high-30s%, FY2022 EPS from a status-quo $5.90 to $8.70 (+47%), and the share price from ~$110 to $221-$255 by June 2021 — a 101-132% total return.

The three reasons

  1. 1

    Employer Services earns only ~19% operating margins versus Paychex's ~41% — a 1,900bps gap despite superior scale

  2. 2

    ADP spin-offs Solera and CDK both expanded margins ~2,000bps within a few years of leaving ADP, proving the potential is real

  3. 3

    Fixing ADP lifts FY2022 EPS from $5.90 to $8.70 (+47%) and the share price to $221-$255 — a 101-132% total return by June 2021

Primary demands

  • Elect Pershing's three nominees (William Ackman, Veronica Hagen, V. Paul Unruh) to the ADP board
  • Form a board committee to oversee an operational transformation plan
  • Redesign management incentives and compensation to align with long-term value
  • Accelerate investment in product and back-end technology; sunset legacy COBOL/PeopleSoft systems
  • Reduce excess support headcount and unwind the siloed matrix corporate structure
  • Restore sub-segment disclosure (revenue, retention, profitability by SMB/Mid-Market/Enterprise/International)

KPIs cited

Employer Services operating margin (ex-float)
ADP ~19% vs Paychex ~41% — 1,900bps gap; potential expansion of 1,500-2,000bps by FY2022
Adjusted gross profit margin
ADP 60% vs Paychex 74% — 1,500bps gap
Net Operational Revenue per Employee
ADP $161k vs Paychex $214k (1.3x); ADP flat since 2008 while Paychex compounded 4.4%
Sales force productivity per quota-carrying rep
ADP ~$165k vs Paychex $205k, Paycom $427k, Ultimate $1,134k; ADP down ~20% vs 2011 on net basis
Systems Development & Programming spend
ADP $859m (9% of net op revenue) vs Ultimate $159m (20%); ~65% of ADP's spend on legacy maintenance
Enterprise client count CAGR
Down ~8% per year (5,000 in 2009 to ~2,500 in 2017); Mid-Market 0% CAGR
FY2022 EPS
$5.90 status quo vs $8.70 transformation case (+47%)
Total Shareholder Return potential
101-132% over four years to June 2021 (IRR 20-25%) at 24x-28x P/E on $8.70 EPS
Management layers between BU President and lowest level
~11 at ADP vs 4-5 at Paychex

Pattern membership

Where this document fits across the library's 12 rhetorical / structural patterns. Orange cells are present in this deck; neutral cells are not.

Precedents cited

  • Solera (formerly ADP Claims Services Group) — margins expanded ~2,000bps within 5 years of 2006 sale
  • CDK Global (formerly ADP Dealer Services) — Sachem Head activism, +1,300bps EBITDA margin transformation plan post-2014 spin
  • Paychex margin trajectory (~20% in late 1990s → 32% by 2001 → 38% by 2013)
  • Ultimate Software — Wall Street consensus on 30-40% structural margin potential at scale

Composition what's on the 168 slides

Visual + textual elements counted across every slide in this deck. Hover a box for what that element is; click to see every slide in the corpus that uses it.

Slide gallery ·

All 168
No slide inventory yet

Pass-2 extraction may still be in progress for this deck.

Notes

Initial public deck of Pershing's 2017 ADP proxy contest, filed shortly after the Aug 7, 2017 Schedule 13D and ahead of the November annual meeting; classified as proxy_fight rather than initial_thesis because the contest is already underway and the deck is positioned as a solicitation. Stake percentage not disclosed within this document (references Schedule 13D for ownership detail) — left null per instructions. Heavy use of expert-network quotes from former ADP executives ('SVP of Technology', 'Former DVP Business Transformation', 'Former CEO and COO of [Redacted] ADP Country') as a rhetorical device. Strong use of CEO quote contradictions (Carlos Rodriguez 'best direct sales force in the world' juxtaposed against productivity decline). Solera/CDK case studies function as before-after proof points. Sum-of-parts present at the sub-segment margin level (SMB ~41%, Mid-Market 35-45%, Enterprise mid-20s-30%+, International mid-20s-30%) rather than asset-by-asset breakup valuation. Section dividers (I-IX plus A-F) take up many of the 168 pages, so the deck is not as dense as the page count suggests.