Contrarian Corpus
activist full deck follow up
2016-04-26 · 82 pages

Multiple (portfolio-level LP update: MDLZ, APD, ZTS, QSR, CP, HHC, VRX, PAH, NOMD, HLF short)

The three reasons

  1. 1

    Mondelez 13% EBIT margin vs 17-26% peers implies +600-700 bps optimized EBIT upside under 3G playbook

  2. 2

    Valeant is stabilizable: new CEO Papa, board refresh, ad-hoc review complete — 83% drawdown overshoots fundamentals

  3. 3

    Herbalife pyramid has stopped growing, top 1% capture 89% of earnings, FTC action appears forthcoming

Primary demands

  • Mondelez: adopt 3G-style zero-based budgeting to close margin gap vs packaged food peers
  • Valeant: install new CEO (Joe Papa), refresh board, stabilize company after 83% decline
  • Herbalife: FTC action to shut down alleged pyramid scheme
  • Zoetis: continue cost-structure initiative to lift operating margin 25% (2014) to ~34% (2017)

KPIs cited

PSH Q1 2016 net returns
-25.6% vs S&P 500 +1.3%; YTD -16.8%
Cumulative net returns since Jan 2004 inception
+476.7% vs S&P 500 +143.4% through 4/19/2016
Total Firm AUM (4/1/2016)
$11.375 billion
Valeant Q1 2016 contribution
-16.2% to PSH gross returns (largest detractor)
Mondelez CY2015 EBIT margin vs peers
MDLZ 13.1% vs Kraft Heinz 26.5%, Hershey 20.0%, peer median ~17%
Mondelez 2018 EBIT margin target
Mgmt 17-18% vs Pershing-estimated optimized level 'far higher'
Mondelez SKU and supplier rationalization
SKUs 74k (2013)→30k (2015); suppliers 100k (2013)→60k (2015)
Heinz gross margin under 3G
+600 bps consolidated (36%→42%) and +1,100 bps Europe (38%→49%) in 2 years
Air Products operating margin
15% pre-investment → 22% most recent quarter
Zoetis cost program
$300mm annual savings; 25% (2014) → ~34% (2017) operating margin
Canadian Pacific operating ratio
Q1 2016 record 58.9% OR; improved 370 bps in 2015; mid-50s long-term target
CP total return since Pershing cost basis
+251% to April 21, 2016
QSR/Restaurant Brands return since Justice merger
+165% from average cost
Valeant decline from Pershing cost
-83% from $196 avg cost to ~$33
Mondelez economic ownership
~5.7%
Zoetis economic ownership
~8.6%
Valeant economic ownership
~9% including options
Herbalife top 1% earnings concentration
89% of 2015 earnings captured by top 1% (up from 85% in 2014); 86% of members received $0
Herbalife member base growth
Gross new adds 2.24mm (2014) → 2.08mm (2015); total base flatlined at 4.0mm
HHC run-rate NOI trajectory
~$43mm (2010) → expected $219mm at stabilization in 2019
PSH discount to NAV (4/19/2016)
-9.8% (historical avg -5.4%, peak discount -18.1% on 3/16/2016)

Pattern membership

Where this document fits across the library's 12 rhetorical / structural patterns. Orange cells are present in this deck; neutral cells are not.

Precedents cited

  • Heinz under 3G: +600 bps consolidated gross margin and +1,100 bps Europe in 2 years
  • Anheuser-Busch under 3G/InBev: +1,300 bps EBIT margin in 3 years
  • Perrigo under Joe Papa: 24% annualized shareholder return
  • Vemma FTC complaint as road-map for Herbalife enforcement
  • CN transformation under Hunter Harrison (implicit via CP operating-ratio comp)

Composition what's on the 82 slides

Visual + textual elements counted across every slide in this deck. Hover a box for what that element is; click to see every slide in the corpus that uses it.

Slide gallery ·

All 82
No slide inventory yet

Pass-2 extraction may still be in progress for this deck.

Notes

Pershing Square's 2016 European Investor Meeting — a fund-level LP update covering the entire portfolio rather than a single-target thesis. Structure: Q1 2016 performance (-25.6%, worst quarter in fund history), then per-position recaps on MDLZ, APD, ZTS, QSR, CP, HHC, VRX, PAH, NOMD (longs) and HLF (short), followed by PSH capital-structure/NAV update and team update (Paul Hilal departure). Each position gets 3-8 slides with bull case + annotated share-price chart. Herbalife section (pp. 61-69) is the most polemical — uses Michael Johnson 2005 retreat video quote ('recruiting ... most vital part of our bloodstream') as contradiction to retail-sales defense, cites Vemma FTC complaint as road-map, and shows pyramid-growth flatlining + 89%-of-earnings-to-top-1% concentration. Mondelez section (pp. 11-21) is the strongest peer-gap argument: 10-peer EBIT margin bar chart (p. 14) and Heinz/AB-InBev 3G case studies (p. 16, p. 18). Valeant section (pp. 44-50) is de facto crisis-management communication post March 15 collapse rather than a thesis pitch. Campaign phase = follow_up because most positions are multi-year follow-ons, not initial theses. Visuals are standard institutional Pershing template (blue headers, simple tables and bar charts) — clean but not editorial-tier; no novel craft worth swiping.