Contrarian Corpus
activist conference presentation victory lap
2010-05-26 · 89 pages

General Growth Properties GGP

At $14, GGP implicitly prices spinco GGO at negative $1; PF GGP alone merits ~$15 on Simon's 6.6% peer cap rate, pointing to ~$20 combined intrinsic and ~43% upside by year-end emergence.

Thesis

Pershing's 2009 Ira Sohn thesis on GGP has played out: the stock is up more than 1,000% from $1.19 to $14, property-level creditors are getting a 6.5-year extension at 5.07%, and the Brookfield/Fairholme/Pershing-backed recapitalization will pay unsecureds in full. The update argues the rally isn't over. Post-emergence, PF GGP — ~200 class-A regional malls with $2.3bn LTM cash NOI, 78% non-recourse debt, and industry-leading $424 sales-per-square-foot — still trades at an ~8% implied cap rate versus 6.6% for Simon, leaving ~$15/share of intrinsic value. Spinco GGO, holding Summerlin, Woodlands, South Street Seaport, and marquee development land, adds ~$5/share. Combined fair value is ~$20, implying ~43% upside by year-end emergence, with GGO effectively thrown in for negative $1.

SCQA

Situation

GGP is America's second-largest mall REIT — ~200 class-A regional malls and $2.3bn LTM cash NOI — that filed Chapter 11 in 2009 with its stock at $1.19, when the market assumed equity would be wiped out.

Complication

Despite Pershing's 2009 plan working — creditors paid in full, stock up 1,000% to $14 — GGP still trades at an 8% implied cap rate versus 6.6% at Simon, a gap driven by bankruptcy-driven index exclusion, not economics.

Resolution

Support the Brookfield/Fairholme/Pershing-backed plan of reorganization, emerge as two public companies (PF GGP the mall REIT and GGO the development spin), and participate in the IPO-style equity raise at $15/share.

Reward

PF GGP's $2.3bn NOI at Simon-equivalent cap rates implies ~$15/share; GGO adds ~$5; combined intrinsic value is ~$20 versus today's $14, implying ~43% upside by year-end emergence with GGO effectively free.

The three reasons

  1. 1

    PF GGP's $2.3bn NOI at Simon's 6.6% peer cap rate supports ~$15/share — alone above today's $14

  2. 2

    GGO (Summerlin, Woodlands, South Street Seaport) adds ~$5/share, implicitly priced at negative $1

  3. 3

    Post-emergence re-indexing drives ~$9bn of forced REIT demand against a ~$3.8bn IPO supply

Primary demands

  • Back the Brookfield / Fairholme / Pershing Square plan of reorganization, paying unsecured creditors in full and preserving equity
  • Emerge GGP as two public companies: PF GGP (class-A mall REIT) and GGO (master-planned communities and development assets)
  • Transfer 13 underperforming 'Special Consideration Properties' to lenders to upgrade portfolio quality

KPIs cited

GGP stock price performance
Up >1,000% since Ira Sohn 2009 ($1.19 to $14), though TEV up only 12% vs. Simon TEV +29%
Secured debt extension
$15bn of GGP property-level secured debt consensually extended at 5.07% WAIR, 6.5-yr weighted average life
PF GGP LTM adjusted cash NOI
$2,290mm pro forma after SCP / GGO / Highland carve-outs
PF GGP operating metrics vs peers
$424 sales/sqft, 91.3% occupancy, 14.3% occupancy cost — leading Simon ($420 / 91.0% / 15.1%), Westfield, Macerich
Q1'10 comp tenant sales growth
GGP +7.5% vs. Simon +6.6%, Westfield +5.3%, Macerich +3.4%
Implied cap rate
At $15/share PF GGP trades at 6.6% cap rate in line with peers; at $14 implies 8.0% cap rate net of GGO
Non-recourse leverage mix
PF GGP will be 78% non-recourse vs Simon <52%, Westfield <20%, Macerich <89%
Interest coverage ratio
Improves from 1.2x pre-emergence to 2.0x post-emergence
REIT investor crossholdings gap
Top 25 REIT holders own ~60% of top five REITs but <1% of GGP — ~$9bn of forced buying to normalize
IPO supply vs demand
~$3.8bn PF GGP IPO supply (255mm shares at $15) vs. ~$9.7bn anticipated dedicated-REIT demand
PF GGP market cap at $15
~$16bn — would be second-largest REIT in the IYR index after Simon

Pattern membership

Where this document fits across the library's 12 rhetorical / structural patterns. Orange cells are present in this deck; neutral cells are not.

Precedents cited

  • Pershing Square's own 2009 Ira Sohn thesis 'The Buck's Rebound Begins Here' on GGP

Composition what's on the 89 slides

Visual + textual elements counted across every slide in this deck. Hover a box for what that element is; click to see every slide in the corpus that uses it.

Slide gallery ·

All 89
No slide inventory yet

Pass-2 extraction may still be in progress for this deck.

Notes

Delivered at the 2010 Ira Sohn Conference as 'Part II' to Ackman's 2009 'Buck's Rebound Begins Here' GGP pitch. Hybrid victory-lap + forward-thesis structure: first ~40% recaps the 2009 bankruptcy call playing out (stock +1,000%, creditors paid in full); remainder pivots to the post-emergence sum-of-parts opportunity (PF GGP ~$15 + GGO ~$5 = ~$20 vs $14 price). Strong before/after spine — explicit 'A Little Context...' section (pp.8-22) resolves into 'The World has Improved Dramatically' checklist (p.23). Memorable rhetorical devices: 'a mall is like a trust holding a portfolio of bonds' analogy; four-slide non-recourse-vs-recourse leverage teaching walkthrough with a 'Mr. Bill' clown 'OHH NOOO!!!' image when recourse equity gets wiped out — rare visual humor for a Pershing deck. Simon Crossholdings slide (p.39) is the rhetorical peak: top 25 REIT holders own ~60% of peer REITs but <1% of GGP, implying $9bn of forced demand. Closes with Steve Jobs-style 'And one more thing...' surprise reveal of a new ~150mm-share Citigroup position (p.68) and a plug for Christine Richard's book on Ackman's MBIA battle. No villain — constructive/analytical throughout; Simon/GGP management quotes are used supportively, not as contradiction. Stake in GGP not disclosed as a % in this document, though 190mm clawback shares for Pershing+Fairholme combined are referenced.