Contrarian Corpus
activist full deck follow up
2016-04-26 · 82 pages

Multiple (Pershing Square portfolio: MDLZ, APD, ZTS, QSR, CP, HHC, VRX, NOMD, HLF-short)

N 3 Narrative
V 3 Visual
C 2 Craft
Original source ↗

The three reasons

  1. 1

    Mondelez EBIT margin of 13.1% is far below peers (Kraft Heinz 26.5%, Hershey 20.0%) and well short of 3G playbook results

  2. 2

    Herbalife is a pyramid scheme whose top 1% captured 89% of earnings while 86% of members earned nothing

  3. 3

    Despite Q1 2016 -25.6% hit from Valeant, long-term strategy compounded at 476% vs S&P 143% since 2004

Primary demands

  • Mondelez: drive EBIT margin from 13% to optimized level well above 17-18% 2018 target via 3G-style ZBB, SKU reduction and procurement
  • Air Products: continue Seifi Ghasemi transformation; complete Versum Materials spin-off and close 350bps margin gap vs Praxair
  • Zoetis: execute $300mm cost reduction program; lift operating margins from 25% (2014) to ~34% by 2017
  • Valeant: stabilize company post-collapse; install Joe Papa as CEO; file 10-K and resolve Philidor accounting
  • Herbalife: force regulatory action and exposure of pyramid scheme structure

KPIs cited

Q1 2016 PSH net return
-25.6% vs S&P 500 +1.3%
Cumulative net return since 2004 inception
Pershing Square L.P. 476.7% vs S&P 500 143.4% through 4/19/2016
Mondelez 2015 EBIT margin
13.1% vs Kraft Heinz 26.5%, Hershey 20.0%, Smucker 17.7%, Kellogg 14.3%
Heinz gross margin under 3G
+600 bps consolidated (36%->42%) and +1,100 bps in Europe (38%->49%) in two years
Mondelez EBIT margin trajectory
11% (2013) -> 13% (2015) -> 17-18% (2018 target) with PS-implied optimized level higher
Air Products operating margin
Increased from 15% pre-investment to 22% most recent quarter
Zoetis cost program
$300mm annual cost savings target by 2017; margins from 25% (2014) to ~34% (2017E)
Canadian Pacific operating ratio
Record 58.9% in Q1 2016 vs mid-50s long-term target
Valeant share price decline
-83% from PS average cost of $196 to ~$35 at April 21, 2016
Herbalife top-1% earnings concentration
89% of all earnings in 2015, up from 85% in 2014; 86% of members received zero compensation
Herbalife membership stagnation
Total EOP members 4.0mm in 2015 (flat vs 2014); gross new member adds declined YoY

Pattern membership

Where this document fits across the library's 12 rhetorical / structural patterns.

Notable slides (11)

Notes

Annual European LP investor meeting covering the full Pershing Square portfolio rather than a single activist campaign. Filename prefix '2016-02' is misleading; cover date is April 26, 2016. Structure: (1) YTD performance review after catastrophic Q1 2016 (-25.6%), (2) position-by-position portfolio update for MDLZ, APD, ZTS, QSR, CP, HHC, VRX, NOMD, (3) Herbalife short thesis refresh, (4) PSH closed-end fund update and NAV discussion, (5) team/Q&A. Tone shifts: analytical/educational for longs (especially Valeant damage-control narrative — Ackman joined board, Papa installed), adversarial for Herbalife (pyramid scheme language, CEO Johnson quoted verbatim on recruiting being the 'bloodstream'). Good specimen for the Mondelez peer-gap EBIT chart (p14) and the 3G/Heinz case study (p18) used to anchor operational upside. The Herbalife subsection is the cleanest contrarian argument in the deck — uses management's own 10-K language, invented-metric critique ('Active New Members'), and pyramid-collapsing KPIs. Campaign phase is 'follow_up' because every position is a years-old PS holding being re-underwritten, not introduced. Target company field is 'Multiple' by necessity.